Showing posts with label Movie. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Movie. Show all posts
Tuesday, June 18, 2013
Is Jesus the Man of Steel?
I've seen a few articles commenting on how Warner Bros paid a theologian to market the new Man of Steel to Christians by comparing it to the story of Jesus. It's a great marketing idea, it seems pastors are always looking for some kind of new media to demonstrate the gospels through. But is this polluting the gospel to compare the sacred stories of Jesus in the gospels to this modern Hollywood blockbuster?
I would say no. It's not wrong or polluting. In fact, I think we can see Christ's symbolic presence in almost any captivating story that contains good vs evil. Of course the story is going to be different and have its own spins on theological symbols within it, but that is to be expected of symbolism in general. I just saw Man of Steel this past weekend with one of my friends, so I thought I would look into some of the symbolism here. Is Jesus the Man of Steel? This post will contain spoilers.
At a first glance it is easy to see the Christian symbolism. Clark is living among humans, yet he is so much more than that. He is constantly hiding who he is because his "time has not yet come" to show his true identity to the world. When Zod, a Kryptonian general, comes to earth, he seeks Clark by threatening the whole world to give him up. Clark, after reflection at a church, decides that he will not submit himself to Zod, but rather submits himself to the human race. He willingly lets the military bind him and takes him in for questioning, despite the fact that he could escape at any time. The military reluctantly hands him over to Zod to appease him. Aboard Zod's ship, which has been designed to replicate Krypton's harsher environment, we see Clark weak for the first time. He spits up blood, and passes out. After a psychic conversation with Zod, Clark confirms that Zod is trying to replicate Krypton's environment on the earth, which would wipe out humanity.
Clark, with the help of his Kryptonian father's electronic consciousness, Jor-El, escapes, and after quite a bit of planning and battling he sends Zod's companions back into the Phantom Zone and goes head to head with Zod himself, where Clark emerges victorious, being forced to kill Zod when he was trying to fry some humans with his heat vision. The end shows Clark, now established as Superman, throw down a military drone in front of a sergeant, who was trying to use the drone to find out where Superman dwells. Superman makes it clear that he is on humanity's side, but also that he can never be controlled by the government.
Christ metaphors abound. The human child who is "not of this earth." The choice to submit to human rulers when he could have easily resisted. The fall of a hero, only to rise up and reveal his identity to the world and to save it simultaneously. That much is easy to see. But what really intrigued me the most in this allegory was Zod. If Superman was Christ, who was Zod in all of this?
The easy answer would be Satan. It would just make sense, right? Well, not really. Zod had good intentions: he wanted to restore his home. Does Satan have any remnant of good intentions? In the final battle between Superman and Zod, Zod emerges from the ashes of a ravaged city, and tells Superman that he destroyed Zod's purpose and the future of his people. He tells Superman, "My soul... that is what you have taken from me!" and then proceeds to attack him.
Zod seems too human to me to be Satan. I think that he is the Jews of the gospels. Now bear with me, this movie was not antisemitic. In the gospels the Jews thought they were God's chosen people. They wanted a political Messiah who would come to return Israel to its former glory. They demanded Jesus death despite the reluctance of Pilate. They sound like Zod to me.
As with all allegory, we must look past the metaphors and fictitious elements to see the point that is being portrayed. The point of the movie was not to demonize 1st century Jews. Instead, allegories work to inspire ideas with modern implications. So what can we infer from investigating the heavy Christ allegory in Man of Steel?
That's easy. We want to be like Superman, and therefore like Christ. We want to protect humanity despite any alienation we experience from it. We want to have the willpower he has to always do what we know is right, despite any power we possess. But more importantly, we don't want to be like Zod. We don't want to let our power get the best of us when it comes to getting what we want. We don't want to perpetuate a culture that brings violence to other worlds, coldly restricts personal rights and liberties, and is oblivious to the realty around it, such as an imploding planet core. We don't want to be the Jews as described in the gospels.
Christians today, however, seem to confuse Jesus' identity like the Jews of the gospels did. They say they love Jesus because they want to fit under the "right" faction in their religious worldview, but they really tend to like the Jews as portrayed in the gospels more than Jesus. They say that Christ is a personal savior, but really think he is mighty king to come at the end times to judge with an iron rod, separating the worthy from the unworthy. Does this sound like Superman or Zod? Jesus' nature, or the nature of the Messiah the Jews of the Bible wanted?
In the same way Christians often try to establish Jesus as a political ruler, which is contrary to his nature (John 18.36). They want America to be ruled by a religious code enforced through the government, like a ban on homosexual marriage. They say we have kicked God out of our country, which may be true, but is forcing our own religious culture onto an entire country Christ-like? Could perhaps this be symbolized by Zod's terraforming machine? Many would argue that culture and values are always being forced by the government, which I am not arguing against. But since when were Christians supposed to be part of the ways of this world? Jesus changed the world through inspiring others through wisdom and selfless love, not control. It seems like most Christians want Christ to be what he was not: a controlling Messiah. They are putting new wine into old wineskins. They are dressing Zod up as Superman.
I think the allegory in Man of Steel does a fantastic job of showing the flaw of typical fundamentalist theology today: it's caught in the middle between Superman and Zod. It wants to show God's selfless love to others, but often wants to do so through control and forcing one culture onto another. Does that sound like something Superman would do? Or, more importantly, is this something Jesus did? Nope.
Is Jesus the Man of Steel? I don't know, but he sure as hell isn't Zod.
Tuesday, May 15, 2012
Body Modification
I just watched a documentary on Netflix called Modify. It's all about body modifications and the issues surrounding it. As a movie, it was good. It got me thinking and I learned some crazy things people do to their bodies. For those considering watching it, it's not for the squeamish. They show graphic operations on different body parts, including genitalia.
The documentary covered all kinds of issues surrounding body modification. It discussed the legality of it, the ethics of it, how it is perceived in religions, and the judgement and discrimination that comes with major modifications. As far as my opinion, I think it should be legal. Why not? If someone has the money and lack of social inhibition to make them look like a cat or a lizard then go for it. It's not imposing on my rights. Is it ethical? Well, seeing as it is not being pushed, sure. It can lead to addiction, but so can gambling and caffeine. I don't think doctors should push a penis split or a boob job, but beyond that I don't think it's wrong to allow. But what I don't understand is how people can be mad about the job discrimination. If you are putting that much work into looking different from the world, don't be angry when the world rejects you. I mean as a person, yes, you shouldn't treat someone like dirt for making themselves look different. I don't think I should be required to wear clothes when I go out in public, I think human bodies should not be seen as taboo, but I'm not going to go outside completely naked and expect people to be okay with it. If that's a stance I want to take someday, good for me. But if you are going to do that kind of stuff have common sense. I mean I wouldn't hire the cat man as a customer service worker. I might think he looks stunning, but I know he will make people uncomfortable. Whether that should be the way it is or not is irrelevant, it is what it is right now.
But I do sympathize with people who do feel judged. We all need a little rebellion from society, I think it's healthy. For some it's smoking the occasional cigarette, for some it's having eight-inch gauges. It's really not that big of a deal. We all modify our bodies to some extent. People pierce their ears, get their bodies waxed, get tattoos, etc. Even working out is a body modification. While I find radical body modifications unattractive, it doesn't really matter. It might look weird to most, but it's their body, not mine.
![]() |
| While I would never do this to myself, I still geeked out when I saw it. |
Social aspect aside, I would never go as far as most these people have gone. While I am not all about being completely natural (yes, I manscape some body hair), there is a big part of me that wants to look human. Putting implants on my arms or having my penis split just looks unattractive to me, it looks alien. I am more comfortable slightly modifying the body I have, like trimming some body hair, and who knows? Maybe one day I'll even get a discrete tattoo.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)






